• From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
• To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:49:06 -0800

On 2009-11-11, at 12:50 AM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:

> As suggested by Jim Tivy earlier, a generic phrase like "XML Schema"
> in the XML spec, while referring to XML validation would be helpful to
> readers, in the present context.

Absolutely not.  The various XML schema languages need well-formed  
XML. Well-formed XML exists independent of any schemas.  The fact that  
DTDs were baked into XML 1.0 is a historical accident.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Michael Ludwig <milu71@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>