• From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
• To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:45:43 -0800

On 2009-11-08, at 5:27 AM, Mukul Gandhi wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a... 
> > wrote:
>> Because XSD is complete crap that utterly betrayed the premises and  
>> goals of
>> XML perhaps?
>
> Rick, I do not know why you condemn XSD so much :) I feel, XSD doesn't
> deserve so much condemnation.

I thought Rick was being fair.  XSD is a failure by any sane technical  
measure.  There's no reason not to acknowledge this and hopefully  
learn from it in future standardization efforts.  If we don't learn  
from our failures we're condemned to repeat them.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@i...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>