Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Tim, On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@s...> wrote: > I thought Rick was being fair. Â XSD is a failure by any sane technical > measure. I agree, that XSD spec has been quite mammoth and functionally complex. That's the only aspect, I see XSD being different from most of other W3C specs. From functional point of view, I don't think XSD doesn't work. So many numerous XML applications currently used XSD. I don't think, there is anything wrong with the basic core/philosophy of XSD. I guess, some of users who don't like XSD generally, it's probably because of it's huge size, and steep learning curve. I believe, XSD also get's functionally better with the upcoming 1.1 release. > There's no reason not to acknowledge this and hopefully learn from > it in future standardization efforts. Pls see my previous remarks :) > If we don't learn from our failures > we're condemned to repeat them. I agree. That's true for any endeavors we get engaged in :) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
