• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:40:29 +1100

Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Since DTD is already mentioned in the XML spec, why not specify XSD as
> well as a normative reference to a future XML spec?  
Because XSD is complete crap that utterly betrayed the premises and 
goals of XML perhaps?
> I think, mentioning XSD in the XML spec will encourage users to use
> XSD as a better validation technology, than DTD. Mentioning this as a
> reference link in XML spec, looks like a very minor and non disruptive
> addition to me, for the XML spec
The way to use XSD as a better validation technology is to learn from 
it, rather than encourage it.

Cheers
Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@i...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>