Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> wrote: > W3C SVG for example uses RELAX NG not XSD. > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/ Thanks for the reference. > Pretty stable? How many full implementations are there of XSD 1.1 today > (apart from Michael's?) It seems, Xerces-J' s XSD 1.1 implementation is also on the way. I also feel, number of complete implementations of a spec is not the only measure of usefulness of any language. The language being much complex and providing lot of functionality, in fact I think raises the bar on quality and skills of implementers. > And Mukul's Xerces release won't be > out until December, will it, hence the spruiking I guess? I am just one of the persons, who has contributed somewhat to Xerces-J XSD 1.1 implementation. It's not fair to say, that Xerces is mine :( But I like Xerces very much. > Err...the naive user is correct. The entity mechanism is integrated in XML, > it is not a severable layer. Â Entities are declared with the DTD mechanism; > XSD provides no alternative to this. I am really not sure, why entities are not allowed to be defined in XSD. I believe, there is some design principle behind that, and also the XML Schema WG must be aware about this issue I believe. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
