• From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:47:42 +0530

btw, I am just curious if another revision of XML spec is planned for
future? If yes, then this request of a better explanation of "XML
validation" might be considered into that.

If no further revisions to XML specs are planned, then it's better to
have this request discarded and we can live with our current
understanding.

Inspite of all of these state of affairs with XML standards, XML is
certainly tremendously successful, and we all know what XML validation
mean and how it relates to DTD, XSD etc :)

I think, this thread ought to get closed now, unless somebody wants to
write anything else.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...> wrote:


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>