• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:09:06 +1100

Jim Tivy wrote:
>
> The above definition of the term "valid" is not really common Xml usage
> anymore. I have seen the term "valid" used when a document has no DTD and
> "validates" against an XML schema - for instance Oxygen uses this term - or
> Xml Schema Primer says:
>   
A standard does not reflect common usage. It defines its own little 
world of tight technical terms.  You are thinking of a dictionary perhaps?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Dan Vint <dvint@d...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>