• From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@s...>
• Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:56:56 +0530

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@s...> wrote:
> The fact that DTDs were
> baked into XML 1.0 is a historical accident.

I think, this statement affirms my point to some extent :)


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>