• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 06 Dec 1999 10:33:46 +0100

* David Megginson
| 
| Sure -- is there a strong need for a common C interface, though?  We
| already have Expat's C interface, and I don't know of anyone else in
| that space yet.

* Thomas B. Passin
|
| But C is available on most _any_ platform - often for free.  So
| almost anyone could compile in C but not necessarily in C++.  Isn't
| rxp done in C?

It is, and I think libxml is also.

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread