• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XMLDev list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 18:49:01 -0500 (EST)

Tim Bray writes:

 > At 04:27 PM 12/2/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
 > >I'll be posting three follow-up messages on SAX/C++ to stimulate
 > >discussion:
 > 
 > Good idea, one question.  Any way to do C at the same time? -Tim

Sure -- is there a strong need for a common C interface, though?  We
already have Expat's C interface, and I don't know of anyone else in
that space yet.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: fujisawa@t... (Jun Fujisawa)
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Content or Metadata?
• Next by Date: Re: Any XML Schemas validators out yet ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread