• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 22:52:47 -0500

David Megginson wrote
> Tim Bray writes:
>
>  > At 04:27 PM 12/2/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>  > >I'll be posting three follow-up messages on SAX/C++ to stimulate
>  > >discussion:
>  >
>  > Good idea, one question.  Any way to do C at the same time? -Tim
>
> Sure -- is there a strong need for a common C interface, though?  We
> already have Expat's C interface, and I don't know of anyone else in
> that space yet.
>
But C is available on most _any_ platform - often for free.  So almost
anyone could compile in C but not necessarily in C++.  Isn't rxp done in C?

Tom Passin


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some questions
• Next by Date: RE: RDF, again
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread