• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 03 Dec 1999 14:52:17 +0100

>>>>> "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>:

> From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

>> The bigger problem is that the SAX style of interface goes over
>> quite naturally into C++, but would be rather awkward in C.

> Well, that's for sure.  Maybe it's not worth the effort.  I was
> mainly thinking about portability to smaller or rarer platforms
> (Amiga, Palm, etc).

The W3C libwww structured stream, is pretty close to the
DocumentHandler, at least:
	http://www.w3.org/Library/src/HTStruct.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML processing instruction survey
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread