• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 08:25:02 -0500

From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
>
> The bigger problem is that the SAX style of interface goes over quite
> naturally into C++, but would be rather awkward in C.
>
Well, that's for sure.  Maybe it's not worth the effort.  I was mainly
thinking about portability to smaller or rarer platforms (Amiga, Palm, etc).

Tom Passin


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: parser asynch input (Was: SAX/C++: First interface draft)
• Next by Date: RE: INTERFACE {was SGML, XML and SML, ugh!}
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread