• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: "XMLDev list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 06 Dec 1999 10:36:46 +0100

* Thomas B. Passin
| 
| I'd second this, with the thought that most of the effort would
| concentrate on finishing the SAX2 interface itself before spending
| the potential "months" on the C++/SAX implementation.

I agree with this as well. If SAX2 is as close to finished as I think
it is, it really should be finished off now, to be followed by a C++
translation of SAX 2.0.

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: SAX2/C++ interface draft [Was: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread