• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:04:45 +0000

2009/11/18 Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>:
> The second is that IMHO it is better to see RELAX NG as part of the ISO DSDL
> standard, so when there is some feature missing from RELAX NG, it may be
> provided elsewhere.  This is a layered approach, where each language tries
> to do one thing really well, rather than a monolithic approach where . For
> example, you organize your system to that there is a master RELAX NG schema,
> then you add your restrictions as a layer in Schematron. You do the detailed
> cardnality constraints in Schematron.

Is this still the Schematron-that-is-a-generated-XSLT-transform, or is
there a Java based streaming validator available now?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: rjelliffe@a...

• References:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Glidden, Douglass A" <Douglass.A.Glidden@b...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>