• From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:03:12 +0530

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> Yes, it's ugly

I personally, won't say XSD is ugly. Just saw the meaning of ugly :)
"Inclined to anger or bad feelings with overtones of menace"
"Provoking horror"

I would not go to such an extent, while talking about XSD. But I
agree, that it is over engineered and over specified. But I guess,
over engineering/over specification is good for users.

> and very hard to use

Yes definitely, I agree that XSD has steep learning curve.

> and doesn't do a lot of things that people might like it to do.

Perhaps, this would get better with the 1.1 version.


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>

• References:
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Sokolov" <sokolov@i...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>