• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:52:23 +0200
• Cc: Liam Quin <liam@w...>, 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• Organization: Multiconn Technologies
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...> <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>>I'd love to see a more sophisticated XSL-FO being used in browsers.
> 
> 
> The XSL-FOnt-tag language is not very popular among web authors...

Sure, provided none of web browsers support XSL-FO (except for x-smiles 
browser may be).

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko
http://blog.tkachenko.com
Multiconn Technologies, Israel

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C XML Schema design tools
• Next by Date: [ANN] XMLmind XML Editor V2.8
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread