• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:17:27 -0700
• Cc: Liam Quin <liam@w...>, 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...> <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913)

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>I do not think embedding RDF in web pages makes sense, otherwise it
>would be very odd for the W3C to have a rdf-as-xhtml task force...
>  
>
I for one would like to see more web pages with embedded rdf-as-xhtml.

.micah

-- 
  Available for consulting. XForms, web forms, information overload.
  Micah Dubinko                           mailto:micah@d...
  Brain Attic, L.L.C.                        http://brainattic.info
  Yahoo IM: mdubinko
  Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread