• To: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:17:26 +0200
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <20041021193255.GE32505@w...>
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...>

* Liam Quin wrote:
>I'm actually still a little disappointed by today's Web browsers.

Well, you know, web browsers primarily implement cool new W3C technology
such as HTML 4.01 (1997), CSS 2.0 (1998) and DOM (1998)...

>I'd love to see a more sophisticated XSL-FO being used in browsers.

The XSL-FOnt-tag language is not very popular among web authors...

>I'd love to see Web browsers making use of embedded RDF to display
>information about Web pages.

I do not think embedding RDF in web pages makes sense, otherwise it
would be very odd for the W3C to have a rdf-as-xhtml task force...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah@d...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C XML Schema design tools
• Next by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread