• To: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:10:27 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4178BC37.2020007@t...>
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...> <4197459d.583804135@s...> <4178BC37.2020007@t...>

* Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
>>>I'd love to see a more sophisticated XSL-FO being used in browsers.
>> 
>> The XSL-FOnt-tag language is not very popular among web authors...
>
>Sure, provided none of web browsers support XSL-FO (except for x-smiles 
>browser may be).

Well, http://people.opera.com/howcome/1999/foch.html that does not come
by surprise, does it?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] xframe - xsddoc-0.6-beta released
• Next by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread