• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:56:54 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <41a1f65e.629053310@s...>
• References: <4178BC37.2020007@t...> <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...> <4197459d.583804135@s...> <4178BC37.2020007@t...> <419cea1f.625918773@s...> <5.2.0.9.0.20041022142223.0289c980@p...> <41a1f65e.629053310@s...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 13:07, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> 
> Yes, but does it make sense to author web sites using XSL-FO? 

No. Quite nonsense IMHO.

> And even
> if, does it make sense for a web browser to implement XSO-FO?
Yes... sort of, Adobe do it via a plug in.
>  They do not implement PDF either.

But 'they' (Adobe) do enable a user to read a pdf file easily?
Surely that's the end game?

-- 
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook  FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl

• References:
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: UPA and schema handling
• Next by Date: RE: XML Data Modellling/Linking (was RE: Afte r XQuery, are we done?)
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread