• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 19:01:04 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200406121718.41661.miles@m...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E520212EC67@R... t.com> <200406121619.31345.miles@m...> <40CB22F7.2030403@p...> <200406121718.41661.miles@m...>
• Reply-to: danny666@v...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Miles Sabin wrote:

>For seconds, I think it's quite reasonable to question whether it's 
>worth even bothering to read TFM if it's more or less the same old 
>stuff that didn't work last time with no reasonable expectation that 
>the new twist (angle brackets and URIs) is going to help find a useful 
>route out of the blind alley.
>  
>

Last time there wasn't a web.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

Raw
http://dannyayers.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Previous by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Next by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread