• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:36:23 +0100
• In-reply-to: <200406121619.31345.miles@m...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E520212EC67@R... t.com> <200406121500.35724.miles@m...> <40CB1A5F.1010409@p...> <200406121619.31345.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

Miles Sabin wrote:


> OK, so why are you telling Eliotte to RTFM?

So he can decide for himself whether a technology has any merit, as 
opposed to people's ambitions for said technology. RTFM was 
something I learned from you.

cheers
Bill

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Previous by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread