• To: danny666@v...
• Subject: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:10:21 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <40CB36D0.2080502@v...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E520212EC67@R... t.com> <200406121718.41661.miles@m...> <40CB36D0.2080502@v...>
• Sender: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.6

Danny Ayers wrote,
> Miles Sabin wrote:
> >For seconds, I think it's quite reasonable to question whether it's
> >worth even bothering to read TFM if it's more or less the same old
> >stuff that didn't work last time with no reasonable expectation that
> >the new twist (angle brackets and URIs) is going to help find a
> > useful route out of the blind alley.
>
> Last time there wasn't a web.

What I said earlier,

  http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200406/msg00239.html

Cheers,


Miles

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>

• References:
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
  • Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny666@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by Date: Leading the web...elsewhere?
• Previous by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Next by thread: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread