• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:04:44 +0100
• In-reply-to: <40CB36E3.8080903@p...>
• References: <000401c45096$fa882780$c801a8c0@DIDIERHOME> <40CB36E3.8080903@p...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

Bill de hÓra wrote:

.
> _:j36 <http://example.org/exbank-transaction> _:jARP14840 .

Oversight on my part; I shortened the names of the subjects, but 
didn't shorten the values. Above should be:

_:j36 <http://example.org/exbank-transaction> _:j40 .


cheers
Bill

• References:
  • RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
  • Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing)
• Next by Date: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Previous by thread: Re: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing)
• Next by thread: RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread