[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Since when was XSLT lexical driven? As for XQuery, there already is an
XQuery Basic conformance level [which in my personal opinion is the only
sane conformance level] which satisfies most of the rants I've seen
today. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Let sleeping dogs lie, unless they snore.                    

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: Jonathan Robie
> Cc: Sean McGrath; xml-dev@l...
> 
> I think the two sides could probably come to some kind of 
> armistice if XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0 and XQuery were cleanly 
> separated into lexical and type-driven profiles.
> 
>   Paul Prescod
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member