• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,"Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>
• Subject: RE: bohemians, gentry
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:30:53 -0500
• Cc: "Sean McGrath" <sean.mcgrath@p...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54987@R...>

At 06:26 PM 12/4/2002 -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

>Since when was XSLT lexical driven? As for XQuery, there already is an
>XQuery Basic conformance level [which in my personal opinion is the only
>sane conformance level] which satisfies most of the rants I've seen
>today.

And if you don't explicitly import schemas into your queries, then the 
other conformance levels operate the same way as the Basic conformance 
level. The user can choose whether to import schemas into queries or do 
static type checks before doing a query.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: bohemians, gentry
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Next by Date: RE: Quick filter pattern question (XSLT)
• Previous by thread: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Next by thread: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread