• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: bohemians, gentry
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 22:46:11 -0800
• Cc: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>, Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54987@R...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54987@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> Since when was XSLT lexical driven?

XSLT 1.0 does not honour declarations of type other than those made in 
the XSLT stylesheet by the stylesheet author. Anyhow, I'm sure you are 
familiar with the difference in type handling between XSLT 2.0 and XSLT 
1.0 so I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

> As for XQuery, there already is an
> XQuery Basic conformance level [which in my personal opinion is the only
> sane conformance level] which satisfies most of the rants I've seen
> today. 

Is there a conformance level of either XQuery or XPath that allows one 
to avoid the implementation of XML Schema datatypes altogether?

  Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: bohemians, gentry
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • RE: bohemians, gentry
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Next by Date: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Previous by thread: RE: bohemians, gentry
• Next by thread: Re: bohemians, gentry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread