• To: 'tariq abdur-rahim' <ecliptoid330@y...>
• Subject: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:21:28 -0500
• Cc: mike@w..., harvey@e..., xml-dev@l...

Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
language with a little less than XSD and a 
bit more than DTDs.

len

From: tariq abdur-rahim [mailto:ecliptoid330@y...]

Thanks a lot betty, len, and michael.  The input and
advice is very informative and most definately
appreciated.  i guess in a nutshell, DTDs still carry
a certain significance and an amount of usefulness,
but the Schema+Schematron combination is a 'stronger'
approach to take in XML application development.

len, i will definately check out the resources that
you suggested.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: tariq abdur-rahim <ecliptoid330@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by Date: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Previous by thread: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread