• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:21:10 -0700
• Cc: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>,tariq abdur-rahim <ecliptoid330@y...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <200205231616.MAA11258@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417

John Cowan wrote:

> DTDs for entities and other such things are probably dying.

Not that the problem is with DTDs.  After all these years, it seems that 
the jury has come back in and the cost-benefit ratio for entities just 
ain't good.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by Date: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread