• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:43:55 -0700
• Cc: 'tariq abdur-rahim' <ecliptoid330@y...>, mike@w...,harvey@e..., xml-dev@l...
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B4B7@HQ5>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
> vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
> the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
> language with a little less than XSD and a 
> bit more than DTDs.

Well, except for, there seem to be quite a few things you can do with 
RNG but not XSD... -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread