• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 12:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: ecliptoid330@y... ('tariq abdur-rahim'), mike@w..., harvey@e..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B4B7@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at May 23, 2002 11:21:28 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
> vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
> the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
> language with a little less than XSD and a 
> bit more than DTDs.

Make that "more power than DTDs or XSD, minus a few obfuscating
features of each."

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: parser to use
• Next by Date: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Previous by thread: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread