Subject: Re: Sorting network addresses
From: Craig W <codecraig@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:25:34 -0500
|
...skip that last question, i had my xml fixed up again. Sorry adding
descending works just fine.
thanks
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:23:43 -0500, Craig W <codecraig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am not 100% sure. I am just learning XML and XSLT so I don't know
> to much, sorry.
>
> I do have another question...how can I have the network addresses
> sorted descending? When I try adding "order=descending" to each sort
> i get no output.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:19:16 GMT, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyway, thanks for the help....it would still be nice to know why
> > > version 2.0 is acting differently.
> >
> > I didn't think any xslt2 engine other than saxon really claimed to have
> > anything like full conformance at the present time. Does their xslt2
> > engine really work?
> >
> > David
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
> > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> > http://www.star.net.uk
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> http://www.codecraig.com
> http://jroller.com/page/codecraig
>
--
http://www.codecraig.com
http://jroller.com/page/codecraig
| Current Thread |
Michael Kay - 2 Mar 2005 14:47:35 -0000
- Craig W - 2 Mar 2005 14:55:20 -0000
|
|