[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • To: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@y...>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:07:30 -0700

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@y...> wrote:
Michael Kay wrote:
"So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom?
How come I didn't notice?"

Do you think the comparison is appropriate? Compare the scope within which reliable identification must be achieved: Java code finding Java code; and anything finding anything. How come you didn't notice?

What on earth does "anything finding anything" mean?

And if you think XML Namespaces 1.x provides mathematical precision in "finding" anything, you haven't read the spec carefully enough.


--
Uche Ogbuji                                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira                  http://zepheira.com
Author, Ndewo, Colorado                     http://uche.ogbuji.net/ndewo/
Founding editor, Kin Poetry Journal      http://wearekin.org
Editor & Contributor, TNB     http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net    http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji    http://twitter.com/uogbuji


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member