• From: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@m...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:15:17 -0200

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@s...> wrote:
> * Conflating the power of generic markup with the need for endless
> constraints is a terrible idea.

It depends upon the use case.  Some 'data' has a requirement for
specific constraints to be explicit.
The great thing about XML is that you have a choice.  IF you are
marking up text just to divide it into pieces/sections/containers,
etc.  Then do that.  It doesn't mean that is everyones use case.

>
> * Design by committee only works in a limited number of contexts.
>

I agree that design by committee seldom results in a very good
product.  I haven't been involved but from experience in other areas,
I will bet that there were only a handful of people that REALLY
designed XML and related tools/technologies.  Maintenance and input
from a community is vital though.  As can be witnessed by the power
and flexibility of XML.

Regards,
--Tim


-- 
MLHIM VIP Signup: http://goo.gl/22B0U
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Like Us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/mlhim2
Circle us on G+: http://goo.gl/44EV5
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook

• References:
  • Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Lessons learned from the XML experiment
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>