Michael Kay wrote:
"So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom?
How come I didn't notice?"

Do you think the comparison is appropriate? Compare the scope within which reliable identification must be achieved: Java code finding Java code; and anything finding anything. How come you didn't notice?

Hans-J��n

Michael Kay <mike@s...> schrieb am 16:43 Donnerstag, 14.November 2013:

>
> No, I can't in this specific use case.  However, AFAIK there isn't a
> published, standards track grammar for your example.

So Java is broken because there's no international standard for package names like org.w3.dom?

How come I didn't notice?

Michael Kay
Saxonica

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php