• From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>
• To: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:41:11 -0500

A user of a financial instrument should be able to point directly to the
exact requirement for the value lists and any constraints.  

I may be ill-informed but I think FpML is used for derivatives.  Can
FpML describe interest rate swaps?  If so:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-13/business/sns-rt-us-jpmorga
n-lawsuitbre87d00y-20120813_1_bond-issue-interest-rates-outstanding-bond
s

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@g...] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:03 AM
To: Len Bullard
Cc: G. Ken Holman; XML-Dev Mailing list
Subject: Re:  Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?

On 15 August 2012 13:58, Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@s...> wrote:
> Given the FpML case where the value constraints can vary by contract

It doesn't though does it?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>

• References:
  • Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>