• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@s...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:03:16 +0100

On 15 August 2012 13:58, Len Bullard <Len.Bullard@s...> wrote:
> Given the FpML case where the value constraints can vary by contract

It doesn't though does it?



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>

• References:
  • Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • RE: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction?
    • From: "Len Bullard" <Len.Bullard@s...>