Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Given the FpML case where the value constraints can vary by contract, by state, or internationally the usability of a standard set of value assertions is less, correct? In this case, the need for a separately citable enumerated list is greater, correct? IOW, the utility of XSD 1.1 varies by the locale and application per the actual business rules that prevail in a business or contract by type, correct? So unless one can make the case for some n number of stable constraint sets, it is better as Rick suggests to keep the enumerations in separate but (as I am pointing out) citable therefore standard value sets. OTW, the citation of XSD 1.1 for n Business isn't buying the regulator much. It is important given a market that may claim web applications for regulatory systems (say SEC) improve or provide real transparency. In fact, the devil is in the details and the person who makes the decisions may not be a regulator. They may be Andrew or the Technical Committee and their requirements real or imagined may not be regulation. It's of little value to provide constraint systems that don't constrain the value of note provably. len -----Original Message----- From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:g.ken.holman@g...] On Behalf Of G. Ken Holman Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:06 AM To: XML-Dev Mailing list Subject: Re: Will XML Schema 1.1 get traction? <snip /> They won't be able to do that if XSD 1.1 is used to express enumerations and other value constraints that are fluid for users. Whether XSD 1.1 is needed otherwise for structural and lexical constraints remains to be seen, but I don't think there are requirements yet expressed that require us to explore that now. XSD 1.0 seems expressive enough for the simple relationships that exist from having used ISO/IEC 15000-5 Core Component Technical Specification as the modeling methodology. I hope this helps. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Europe -- Oct 2012 Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@C... Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal _______________________________________________________________________ XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
