[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • To: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:07:08 +0000



> XML 1.0/1.1 doesn't include schema does it?  So I don't see why MicroXML
> has to include schema in order to support schema-aware programs like
> JAXB.  One of the good things about schema (unlike DTD) is that it is
> layered *on top of* XML not intertwingled with it.
> 
> -Mike


Technically true, but if were trying to position MicroXML as "XML Lite" and DataBinding is a key feature, 
then we turn around and say "Oh you need XSD for that to work",  I'd just laugh all the way to the bank.




 
----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
dlee@c...
http://www.xmlsh.org




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member