[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@i...>
  • To: David Lee <dlee@c...>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:56:58 -0400

XML 1.0/1.1 doesn't include schema does it?  So I don't see why MicroXML 
has to include schema in order to support schema-aware programs like 
JAXB.  One of the good things about schema (unlike DTD) is that it is 
layered *on top of* XML not intertwingled with it.

-Mike

On 07/16/2012 01:03 PM, David Lee wrote:
>    
>> Doesn't the JAXB model make sense here: push the typing inference to a
>> mapping process that has type awareness in the host language?  Different
>>      
> Yes, but then JAXB requires Schema.
> Do we pull Schema into MicroXML ?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> David A. Lee
> dlee@c...
> http://www.xmlsh.org
>
>    


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member