- From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, "xml-dev@l..."<xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:40:42 -0500
If you still donât know what it means, Michael, then the lawyers were successful. Truly, their goal is to obtain the broadest possible scope in a claim, so any ambiguity is calculated, not accidental. Bruce B Cox OCIO/AED/Software Architecture and Engineering Division 571-272-9004 From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@s...]
Sent: 2012 February 6, Monday 19:14
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: Should one adopt the tag naming convention of an existing XML vocabulary or create one's own tag naming convention? On 06/02/2012 23:32, Cox, Bruce wrote: To give an example, the patent business model has been very stable for about a hundred years. True, the vocabulary has changed Really? As far as I can see, patents still use the word "plurality" as often as they can, and I still don't know if it means "one or more", "two or more", or "zero or more".
Michael Kay
Saxonica |
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
