• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: stephengreenubl@g...
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:44:46 +0000

On 17/12/2010 14:13, Stephen Green wrote:
> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about
> just the following?
>

why?

why if you want a micro-anything, would you want to base the validation 
on xsd rather than relax?

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>

• References:
  • Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>