• From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:09:05 +0000

> why if you want a micro-anything, would you want to base the validation on
> xsd rather than relax?
>

If a validating parser for MicroXML (if such ever got written)
happened to be able
to read Relax then fine - though I would imagine a subset of Relax would be in
order (similar to my MicroXSD perhaps). I just think that there are more parsers
out there for the macro XML (full XML) which can validate using XSD than can
validate using Relax. Either way, something of the same order of complexity as
MicroXSD might be in order but with another name.

Given that

<element name="schema">
<element name="element">
<attribute name="name" type="string"/>
<attribute name="type" type="string">
<!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
</attribute>
</element>
<element name="attribute">
<attribute name="name" type="string"/>
<attribute name="type" type="string">
<!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
</attribute>
</element>
</element>

isn't XSD either, I guess it could be dubbed a candidate strawman for
a neutral MicroSchema (a bit of XSD and a bit of Relax but extremely
simple to make it feasible for even a MicroXML parser to be validating).

----
Stephen D Green



On 17 December 2010 14:44, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:
> On 17/12/2010 14:13, Stephen Green wrote:
>>
>> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about
>> just the following?
>>
>
> why?
>
> why if you want a micro-anything, would you want to base the validation on
> xsd rather than relax?
>
> David
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
> and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
> Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
> powered by MessageLabs.
> ________________________________________________________________________
>

• References:
  • Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Micro XSD for Micro XML?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>