Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG? > Well SVG isn't written as MicroXML so there's no point. ---- Stephen D Green On 17 December 2010 14:21, Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@g...> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Stephen Green > <stephengreenubl@g...> wrote: >> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about >> just the following? >> >> <element name="schema"> >> <element name="element"> >> <attribute name="name" type="string"/> >> <attribute name="type" type="string"> >> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date --> >> </attribute> >> </element> >> <element name="attribute"> >> <attribute name="name" type="string"/> >> <attribute name="type" type="string"> >> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date --> >> </attribute> >> </element> >> </element> >> >> I think it is valid MicoXML, isn't it, and in the spirit of MicroXML >> - easy to parse >> - easy even to execute in MicroXML parsers if need be >> >> Or adding a little more and it could be valid XSD too (but that >> might be going too far in the direction of XSD). > > Could you please give me a small idea of the MicroXSD to validate SVG? >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
