• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• To: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:14:44 -0500

> The number of times I've heard praise for AF on this list, yet
> no one has ever proposed an updated version for XML. Did it 
> have big holes? Was it SGML only? Any reason why it's not been
> reworked? 

There was nothing really that needed to be done to support architectural forms... you can use them today. It might have been nice to have a little syntactic sugar, but it was not necessary... 

• References:
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Norman Gray <norman@a...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>