• From: Norman Gray <norman@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:19:09 +0000

Greetings.

On 2010 Dec 3, at 04:53, James Clark wrote:

> I agree it was done rather hastily, but at the time (as far as I remember)
> there weren't many objections.  It was not obvious how much pain they would
> cause.
> 
> I think the problem was that we started off with some major assumptions,
> which we never really questioned:


I'd always had the impression (or guessed) that namespaces were partly there in order to bring into XML some of the power and obvious utility of architectural forms.  As a matter of history, was that part of that particular zeitgeist?

[that's "power and obvious utility" in the sense of "this is so awesome that it's just _got_ to be majorly useful for situations like, ..., umm...; yes...")

Norman


-- 
Norman Gray  :  http://nxg.me.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• References:
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>