• From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:06:48 +0000

> I think we need to focus on the greatest need.  I considered 
> responding to the earlier "hysteria" comment by saying that most folks 
> on this thread, and certainly James Clark's post were not "running 
> scared" of JSON.  For my part, I embrace it, and I know quite a few 
> others do who still want XML to be simplified.
>
I don't think it's a case of "running scared". I think it's a case of 
trying to learn from JSON how much could be achieved with something much 
simpler than we have today, but without losing the things we really 
value about XML.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

• References:
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: <vojtech.toman@e...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@g...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: <vojtech.toman@e...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>