Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I'd even argue for a minimum *without attributes* and without mixed content, no DTD subset, no namespaces, and only UTF8 support. A processor (parser/ language binding etc) for such a minimum would be much smaller, possibly "JavaScript" small/fast, and on equal footing with JSON. It would still be "XML" (i.e. parseable by full parsers) but vastly useful on its own. ---------------------------------------- David A. Lee dlee@c... http://www.xmlsh.org -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@g...] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:36 AM To: Pete Cordell Cc: David Lee; vojtech.toman@e...; xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Towards XML 2.0 > And presumably it still requires processing of internal DTD for attribute > default values and so on? > > The profiles seem more like XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces + other additional > profile specific stuff, rather than simplifications. Personally it's not > what I'm looking for. Nor me... I think the absolute minimum... just elements, attributes and angle brackets :) That's the tag line anyway. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
