• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:30:19 +0000

On 16/12/2010 19:44, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> "Sensible grammar" falls under "theoretical purity"

that's an unfortunate way to categorise something that as currently 
specified is going to cause real confusion and real costs forever.

David

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
  • XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML5: Re: MicroXML
    • From: rjelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>